|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | ==Gestöbertes== | | ==Gestöbertes== |
| − | ===Bücher===
| |
| − | *Alcuin Blamires: Chaucer, ethics, and gender. Oxford (u.a.): Oxford Univ. Press, 2006
| |
| − | *Sheila Delany (Ed.): Chaucer and the Jews. Sources, contexts, meanings. New York (u.a.) : Routledge, 2002
| |
| − | *Peter Brown: Chaucer at work. The making of the "Canterbury tales". London (u.a.): Longman, 1994
| |
| − | *Ruth Evans and Lesley Johnson (Ed.): Feminist readings in Middle English literature. The Wife of Bath and all her sect. London (u.a.): Routledge, 1994
| |
| − | *Edward E. Foster and David H. Carey: Chaucer's church. A dictionary of religious terms in Chaucer. Aldershot (u.a.): Ashgate, 2002
| |
| − | *Suzanne C. Hagedorn: Abandoned women. Rewriting the classics in Dante, Boccaccio, & Chaucer. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press, 2004
| |
| − | *Seth Lerer: [http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/prin031/92033454.html Chaucer and his readers. Imagining the author in late-medieval England]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1993
| |
| − | *S. H. Rigby: Chaucer in context. Society, allegory and gender. Manchester (u.a.): Manchester Univ. Press, 1996
| |
| − | *Shannon L. Rogers: All things Chaucer. An encyclopedia of Chaucer's world. Westport, Conn. (u.a.): Greenwood Press, 2007
| |
| − | *N. S. Thompson: Chaucer, Boccaccio, and the debate of love. A comparative study of the Decameron and the Canterbury tales. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996
| |
| − | *Gabriele Wendel: "Nach Deinem Text und Deinen Litanein...". Frauenbilder bei Chaucer unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der "Canterbury Tales". Universität Hamburg: Magisterarbeit, 1995
| |
| | | | |
| | ===Rezeption=== | | ===Rezeption=== |
