Difference between revisions of "Talk:Evaluation"
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) |
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | Joanna Pfingsthorn and I produced a new questionnaire: [http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/anglistik/lit-wiss/downloads/seminar-evaluation-3.doc seminar-evaluation-3.doc] - on the basis of your wishes (Holger gave a list, Joanna had some | + | Joanna Pfingsthorn and I produced a new questionnaire: [http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/anglistik/lit-wiss/downloads/seminar-evaluation-3.doc seminar-evaluation-3.doc] - on the basis of your wishes (Holger gave a list, Joanna had some additions, some more questions had to be added from last year's BM1 questionnaire). |
| − | *We left the -2 to +2 scale feeling uneasy about reformulating the questions to | + | *We left the -2 to +2 scale - feeling uneasy about reformulating all the questions to make them fit into a scale of school marks from 1-5 (or 1-6) - i.e. from "very good" to "unacceptable". |
| − | *We tried to make the questionnaire work for both Basismodule and other courses. Holger had asked for feedback on the individual areas the Linguistik BM covered, we decided to add an open question 32 for that purpose. | + | *We tried to make the questionnaire work for both Basismodule and other courses. Holger had asked for feedback on the individual areas the Linguistik BM had covered, we decided to add an open question No. 32 for that purpose. |
| − | I will pass the questionnaire to Nico Müller who will produce a StudIP- draft-version which we will have a chance to evaluate before it will | + | I will pass the questionnaire to Nico Müller who will produce a StudIP- draft-version which we will have a chance to evaluate before it will reach the students. --[[User:Olaf Simons|Olaf Simons]] 12:56, 9 June 2008 (CEST) |
Revision as of 13:05, 9 June 2008
Status 5. Juni 2008
Mit der Stabstelle Lehre, Nicola Albrecht, ist abgesprochen, dass die Anglistik neben den bisherigen papiergestützten Evaluationen eine online Evaluation durchführen wird, die dem Muster des bisjetzigen Evaluationsbogens [1] folgt und über StudIP mit den Kursen verbunden werden wird. Der Erhebungszeitraum wird Campusweit vom 16.6. bis zum 29. Juni liegen, so dass den Lehrenden am Semesterende noch zwei Wochen bleiben, um die Ergebisse in den Kursen zu besprechen.
Ein Evaluationsbogen, der den Ansprüchen der verschiedenen Fachkomponenten genügt, muß bis Dienstag den 10. Juni vorliegen, um von Nico Müller in eine StudIP Fassung gesetzt zu werden. Vorinformationen der Linguistik und der Didaktik zu einem verbesserten Fragebogen des Seminars liegen mir vor. Gestaltungswünsche kann ich noch bis Montag Nachmittag entgegennehmen. --Olaf Simons 17:42, 5 June 2008 (CEST)
- Hallo Olaf: zwei Bemerkungen zu Frage 17. -- statt "Präsentation von Diskussionsfragen durch Studierende" sollte wohl allgemeiner "Präsentationen" stehen.
- "Session summaries" kann wegfallen, ich selber würde höchstens gerne nach der Nützlichkeit der verteilten Bibliographie fragen, muss aber nicht sein. Anton Kirchhofer 22:13, 7 June 2008 (CEST)
Joanna Pfingsthorn and I produced a new questionnaire: seminar-evaluation-3.doc - on the basis of your wishes (Holger gave a list, Joanna had some additions, some more questions had to be added from last year's BM1 questionnaire).
- We left the -2 to +2 scale - feeling uneasy about reformulating all the questions to make them fit into a scale of school marks from 1-5 (or 1-6) - i.e. from "very good" to "unacceptable".
- We tried to make the questionnaire work for both Basismodule and other courses. Holger had asked for feedback on the individual areas the Linguistik BM had covered, we decided to add an open question No. 32 for that purpose.
I will pass the questionnaire to Nico Müller who will produce a StudIP- draft-version which we will have a chance to evaluate before it will reach the students. --Olaf Simons 12:56, 9 June 2008 (CEST)
