Difference between revisions of "Traditions in our discourse about literature"
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) |
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* '''The debate of literature''' – till around 1750 the debate of “learning”, “scientific publications” – '''provided''' | * '''The debate of literature''' – till around 1750 the debate of “learning”, “scientific publications” – '''provided''' | ||
− | :* the institutions: i.e. literary journals, literary histories, the academic debate of publications, and | + | :* the institutions: i.e. literary journals, literary histories, the continuing academic and at the same moment public debate of publications, and |
:* the discursive modalities: literature is “discussed” in fundamentally scholarly debates in an exchange of competing judgments which have to be supported by arguments one can defend in a discussion | :* the discursive modalities: literature is “discussed” in fundamentally scholarly debates in an exchange of competing judgments which have to be supported by arguments one can defend in a discussion | ||
[[Category:Handout|Literature]] | [[Category:Handout|Literature]] |
Revision as of 11:29, 31 May 2007
An awareness of different and not always compatible discourses pervades the field of literary studies: You cannot speak of a “first person narrator offering a monologue” referring to a poem. The first person narrator is “narratology”, the “monologue” dramatology”. Referring to a speech you can speak of an “exordium”, referring to a play you speak about the “exposition”.
The different discourses mix, yet do not completely mix within the discourse of literary criticism. A metaphor is rhetoric – it can, however, be found in a political speech, a commercial advertisement, a Shakespeare play, or a Hemmingway story etc.
The complex situation (how do I know what word to use in what context?) is the result of the complex history that created our modern discourse of literature:
- The debate of literature – till around 1750 the debate of “learning”, “scientific publications” – provided
- the institutions: i.e. literary journals, literary histories, the continuing academic and at the same moment public debate of publications, and
- the discursive modalities: literature is “discussed” in fundamentally scholarly debates in an exchange of competing judgments which have to be supported by arguments one can defend in a discussion