Difference between revisions of "Talk:2008 BM1 Assignment 3: Jekyll and Hyde"
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
i have a little problem with task one.... are we supposed to interpret the characterisations or only identify characterisations and the say which mode they are made in???? | i have a little problem with task one.... are we supposed to interpret the characterisations or only identify characterisations and the say which mode they are made in???? | ||
greetings --[[User:Marietta Sonnenschein|Marietta Sonnenschein]] 16:41, 23 June 2008 (CEST) | greetings --[[User:Marietta Sonnenschein|Marietta Sonnenschein]] 16:41, 23 June 2008 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Concerning task 5: Is it really necessary that the topic, which I choose to discuss, is mentioned explicitly in the given passage or is it okay when the topic becomes important in a later part of the novel? | ||
Revision as of 16:17, 23 June 2008
Do you have any idea how the direct speech of Utterson fits to his character?
I am also unsure if I am supposed to write something about the focalisation in question 4. It asks for the narrative mode in this passage in relation to the narrative structure of the whole text. Now I am a little confused, because in my opinion the focalisation must be left out in this part, but on the other hand one cannot make always a clean cut between focalisation and narration. How do you think about about leaving out focalisation in this task?
- Help me if you can, I'm feeling down.
- And I do appreciate you being 'round.
- Help me get my feet back on the ground,
- Won't you please, please help me? [beatles]
- all a question of what you want: "feet back" or "feedback"... --Olaf Simons 13:24, 20 June 2008 (CEST)
Hi! i have a little problem with task one.... are we supposed to interpret the characterisations or only identify characterisations and the say which mode they are made in???? greetings --Marietta Sonnenschein 16:41, 23 June 2008 (CEST)
Concerning task 5: Is it really necessary that the topic, which I choose to discuss, is mentioned explicitly in the given passage or is it okay when the topic becomes important in a later part of the novel?
