Difference between revisions of "What is literature?"
From Angl-Am
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) (→Literature) |
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) (→Literature) |
||
(19 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*'''literature''' = learning, learned publications | *'''literature''' = learning, learned publications | ||
:* spectrum of materials: predominantly scholarly publications | :* spectrum of materials: predominantly scholarly publications | ||
− | :* discussed in "histories of literature" and in journals reviewing latest events in the republic of learning | + | :* discussed in "histories of literature" (i.e. bibliographies of scientific publications) and in journals reviewing latest events in the republic of learning |
− | :* geographical scope: competition of the nations | + | :* geographical scope: international; competition of the nations, main languages: Latin and French |
:* historical scope: progress in learning and comparison of ancient and modern learning | :* historical scope: progress in learning and comparison of ancient and modern learning | ||
− | *'''belles lettres''' = all fashionable and elegant pieces of learning including poetry | + | *'''belles lettres''' = all fashionable and elegant pieces of learning including poetry and fiction |
:* spectrum of materials: all fashionable publications such as novels, poems, plays, memoirs, (scandalous) histories | :* spectrum of materials: all fashionable publications such as novels, poems, plays, memoirs, (scandalous) histories | ||
:* discussed mainly in prefaces to elegant works, exceptionally also in works of literature | :* discussed mainly in prefaces to elegant works, exceptionally also in works of literature | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*'''poetry/poesy''' = artful compositions of language - mainly versified | *'''poetry/poesy''' = artful compositions of language - mainly versified | ||
− | :* spectrum of materials: poetic genres including prose comedy and all works performed with music as operas, cantatas, masks, ballets | + | :* spectrum of materials: poetic genres including prose comedy and all works performed with music such as operas, cantatas, masks, ballets |
:* discussed in poetological works with a view on beauties of language and the observation of rules every art and genre has to follow | :* discussed in poetological works with a view on beauties of language and the observation of rules every art and genre has to follow | ||
− | :* geographical scope: mostly on the main languages of poetry: (due to | + | :* geographical scope: mostly on the main languages of poetry: (due to the inclusion of the opera) Italian and French |
:* historical scope: search for the ultimate work in each language | :* historical scope: search for the ultimate work in each language | ||
− | *'''fiction''' = | + | *'''fiction''' = stories to be read for their instruction and entertainment even if they should be feigned |
− | :* spectrum of materials: '''romances''' = fictional prose histories of love and | + | :* spectrum of materials: '''romances''' = fictional prose histories of love and heroism presented in a series of adventures; '''novels''' = short stories related for the sake of the "point" they can "exemplarily" make, usually constructed around an intrigue leading to the surprising point |
:* interpreted - after Huet’s ''Treatise on the Origin of Romances'' (1670) - as a cultural indicator | :* interpreted - after Huet’s ''Treatise on the Origin of Romances'' (1670) - as a cultural indicator | ||
:* geographical scope: all cultures united by a world wide transmission of stories and fashions - great interest in foreign tastes | :* geographical scope: all cultures united by a world wide transmission of stories and fashions - great interest in foreign tastes | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==Period of Transition: 1750-1850== | ==Period of Transition: 1750-1850== | ||
− | * The debate of learning adopts and | + | * The debate of learning adopts and appropriates discussions of the belles lettres, poetry and fiction - yet it changes practically all the discussions it adopts |
− | :* it | + | :* it generates perspectives on the nations and their productions (the preceding debates of the belles lettres, poetry and fiction had concentrated on European market trends), |
− | :* it | + | :* it focuses on the "poetic" (now "literary") genres according to Aristotelian precepts (a measure designed to move the international opera out of the field of potical works to be critically discussed), |
− | :* it accepts a reformed novel as a "literary" genre as long as | + | :* it accepts a reformed novel as a "literary" genre as long as this novel can be read as a cultural indicator (a step designed to bar the European chronique scandaleuse from all further critical debates). |
− | + | * Traditional scientific journals offer additional reviews of literature on materials of the belles lettres, new literary journals follow with a focus on poetry, the belles lettres and fiction and change the concept of literature. | |
− | + | * The debate of literature widens as the scope of materials under discussion is narrowed down to the nation's production of poems plays and novels | |
− | + | * The secular school systems adopt the new concept of literature and win a topic to be taught through debates and a critical appeciation of the nation's canonical texts. | |
− | :* | + | * Authors have to decide whether they write |
− | + | :* popular plays and fiction (not discussed), | |
− | + | :* or "high", "literary" works - worthy to be publicly analysed and appreciated | |
− | :* | + | * A new literary production of plays, poems and novels is written to receive the available public attention |
+ | * The supply and demand of poems, plays and fiction grows enormously now that the markets of popular fiction and high literature are established as a battleground of public debates. | ||
+ | * New literary histories are written and spread the notions that | ||
+ | :* literature has (due to its dependence on languages) always developed in national traditions | ||
+ | :* the "literary genres" have always formed a special field of "literary works" | ||
+ | :* literature, i.e. plays, poems and novels have always fulfilled certain ("eternal") purposes in our societies. | ||
==The Landscape of Discourses since the 1850s== | ==The Landscape of Discourses since the 1850s== | ||
* The sciences have developed their own specialised debates | * The sciences have developed their own specialised debates | ||
− | * The general discussion of literature | + | * The general discussion of literature focuses on a small field of poetic and fictional works which can, however, no longer be defined (due to fact that we can switch between all the debates we have adopted whenever we want to discuss something as "literature") |
− | * The question "What Is Literature" | + | * The question "What Is Literature?" now becomes a key question one can ask |
:* to format the national canon | :* to format the national canon | ||
:* to keep materials out of our general debates of cultural phenomena | :* to keep materials out of our general debates of cultural phenomena | ||
− | :* to | + | :* to promote discussions we could appropriate in order to spread (or to limit) our own debate of literature |
==Literature== | ==Literature== | ||
* Roland Barthes. "Histoire ou Litérature?" in R. Barthes, ''Sur Racine'' (Paris, 1963), p.155, first published in ''Annales'', 3 (1960). | * Roland Barthes. "Histoire ou Litérature?" in R. Barthes, ''Sur Racine'' (Paris, 1963), p.155, first published in ''Annales'', 3 (1960). | ||
− | * René Wellek. | + | * René Wellek. "Literature and its Cognates", ''Dictionary of the History of Ideas. Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas'' 1-4, ed. Philip P. Wiener. New York, 1973, 3: p.81-89. |
* Paul Hernadi (ed). ''What Is Literature?''. London, 1978. ISBN 0-253-36505-8 | * Paul Hernadi (ed). ''What Is Literature?''. London, 1978. ISBN 0-253-36505-8 | ||
* Jürgen Fohrmann. ''Projekt der deutschen Literaturgeschichte. Entstehung und Scheitern einer nationalen Poesiegeschichtsschreibung zwischen Humanismus und Deutschem Kaiserreich''. Stuttgart, 1989. ISBN 3-476-00660-3 | * Jürgen Fohrmann. ''Projekt der deutschen Literaturgeschichte. Entstehung und Scheitern einer nationalen Poesiegeschichtsschreibung zwischen Humanismus und Deutschem Kaiserreich''. Stuttgart, 1989. ISBN 3-476-00660-3 | ||
Line 57: | Line 62: | ||
* Richard Terry. "The Eighteenth-Century Invention of English Literature. A Truism Revisited", ''Journal for Eigtheenth Century Studies'' 19.1 (1996). | * Richard Terry. "The Eighteenth-Century Invention of English Literature. A Truism Revisited", ''Journal for Eigtheenth Century Studies'' 19.1 (1996). | ||
* Olaf Simons. ''Marteaus Europa oder Der Roman, bevor er Literatur wurde'' (Amsterdam/ Atlanta: Rodopi, 2001), [http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/anglistik/lit-wiss/simons/marteaus-europa/085-set.html p.85-94]. ISBN 90-420-1226-9 | * Olaf Simons. ''Marteaus Europa oder Der Roman, bevor er Literatur wurde'' (Amsterdam/ Atlanta: Rodopi, 2001), [http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/anglistik/lit-wiss/simons/marteaus-europa/085-set.html p.85-94]. ISBN 90-420-1226-9 | ||
+ | * Olaf Simons. "Why Literature Is Called Literature" Lecture at Rutgers University (April 12, 2007), [http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/anglistik/lit-wiss/simons/2007-04-12/olaf_simons_literature.mp3 mp3-file 37MB] + [http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/anglistik/lit-wiss/simons/2007-04-12/1962_steinbeck-intro.html html-Presentation] | ||
− | [[Category:Handout|Literature]] | + | [[Category:Handout:Literature and Culture|Literature]] |
Latest revision as of 09:35, 17 April 2008
The Landscape of Discourses until 1750/1850
- literature = learning, learned publications
- spectrum of materials: predominantly scholarly publications
- discussed in "histories of literature" (i.e. bibliographies of scientific publications) and in journals reviewing latest events in the republic of learning
- geographical scope: international; competition of the nations, main languages: Latin and French
- historical scope: progress in learning and comparison of ancient and modern learning
- belles lettres = all fashionable and elegant pieces of learning including poetry and fiction
- spectrum of materials: all fashionable publications such as novels, poems, plays, memoirs, (scandalous) histories
- discussed mainly in prefaces to elegant works, exceptionally also in works of literature
- geographical scope: European market, main language French
- historical scope: comparison of ancient and modern elegance
- poetry/poesy = artful compositions of language - mainly versified
- spectrum of materials: poetic genres including prose comedy and all works performed with music such as operas, cantatas, masks, ballets
- discussed in poetological works with a view on beauties of language and the observation of rules every art and genre has to follow
- geographical scope: mostly on the main languages of poetry: (due to the inclusion of the opera) Italian and French
- historical scope: search for the ultimate work in each language
- fiction = stories to be read for their instruction and entertainment even if they should be feigned
- spectrum of materials: romances = fictional prose histories of love and heroism presented in a series of adventures; novels = short stories related for the sake of the "point" they can "exemplarily" make, usually constructed around an intrigue leading to the surprising point
- interpreted - after Huet’s Treatise on the Origin of Romances (1670) - as a cultural indicator
- geographical scope: all cultures united by a world wide transmission of stories and fashions - great interest in foreign tastes
- historical scope: all periods - growing interest in fashions of the past
Period of Transition: 1750-1850
- The debate of learning adopts and appropriates discussions of the belles lettres, poetry and fiction - yet it changes practically all the discussions it adopts
- it generates perspectives on the nations and their productions (the preceding debates of the belles lettres, poetry and fiction had concentrated on European market trends),
- it focuses on the "poetic" (now "literary") genres according to Aristotelian precepts (a measure designed to move the international opera out of the field of potical works to be critically discussed),
- it accepts a reformed novel as a "literary" genre as long as this novel can be read as a cultural indicator (a step designed to bar the European chronique scandaleuse from all further critical debates).
- Traditional scientific journals offer additional reviews of literature on materials of the belles lettres, new literary journals follow with a focus on poetry, the belles lettres and fiction and change the concept of literature.
- The debate of literature widens as the scope of materials under discussion is narrowed down to the nation's production of poems plays and novels
- The secular school systems adopt the new concept of literature and win a topic to be taught through debates and a critical appeciation of the nation's canonical texts.
- Authors have to decide whether they write
- popular plays and fiction (not discussed),
- or "high", "literary" works - worthy to be publicly analysed and appreciated
- A new literary production of plays, poems and novels is written to receive the available public attention
- The supply and demand of poems, plays and fiction grows enormously now that the markets of popular fiction and high literature are established as a battleground of public debates.
- New literary histories are written and spread the notions that
- literature has (due to its dependence on languages) always developed in national traditions
- the "literary genres" have always formed a special field of "literary works"
- literature, i.e. plays, poems and novels have always fulfilled certain ("eternal") purposes in our societies.
The Landscape of Discourses since the 1850s
- The sciences have developed their own specialised debates
- The general discussion of literature focuses on a small field of poetic and fictional works which can, however, no longer be defined (due to fact that we can switch between all the debates we have adopted whenever we want to discuss something as "literature")
- The question "What Is Literature?" now becomes a key question one can ask
- to format the national canon
- to keep materials out of our general debates of cultural phenomena
- to promote discussions we could appropriate in order to spread (or to limit) our own debate of literature
Literature
- Roland Barthes. "Histoire ou Litérature?" in R. Barthes, Sur Racine (Paris, 1963), p.155, first published in Annales, 3 (1960).
- René Wellek. "Literature and its Cognates", Dictionary of the History of Ideas. Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas 1-4, ed. Philip P. Wiener. New York, 1973, 3: p.81-89.
- Paul Hernadi (ed). What Is Literature?. London, 1978. ISBN 0-253-36505-8
- Jürgen Fohrmann. Projekt der deutschen Literaturgeschichte. Entstehung und Scheitern einer nationalen Poesiegeschichtsschreibung zwischen Humanismus und Deutschem Kaiserreich. Stuttgart, 1989. ISBN 3-476-00660-3
- Rainer Rosenberg. "Eine verworrene Geschichte. Vorüberlegungen zu einer Biographie des Literaturbegriffs", Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 77 (1990), 36-65.
- Richard Terry. "The Eighteenth-Century Invention of English Literature. A Truism Revisited", Journal for Eigtheenth Century Studies 19.1 (1996).
- Olaf Simons. Marteaus Europa oder Der Roman, bevor er Literatur wurde (Amsterdam/ Atlanta: Rodopi, 2001), p.85-94. ISBN 90-420-1226-9
- Olaf Simons. "Why Literature Is Called Literature" Lecture at Rutgers University (April 12, 2007), mp3-file 37MB + html-Presentation