Difference between revisions of "Kolloquium"
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<big>'''Forschungskolloquium des Seminars<br>für Anglistik und Amerikanistik'''</big><br><br> | <big>'''Forschungskolloquium des Seminars<br>für Anglistik und Amerikanistik'''</big><br><br> | ||
− | Tue. | + | Tue Jan. 13, 2009<br> |
− | ''' | + | '''Holger Limberg, "Teacher-Student Interaction at University: The Discourse of Academic Office Hours"''' |
− | + | Gleich et al. (1982: 44) have described academic office hours “as an institutionalized form of ‘taking time’ for the student”. While both sides involved in this interaction generally agree on the importance of these encounters, the participants seldom reflect on the possibilities and difficulties that these interactions entail (especially for students). Ethnographic studies have pointed out the necessity for an improvement of teacher – student contact outside of class (e.g. Gleich et al. 1982; Boettcher and Meer 2000). In the research field of academic discourse analysis, very little is known about how teachers and students mutually construct these consultations and how they design their verbal actions to achieve a (successful) outcome. The features of this academic talk (i.e. face-to-face, interactive, student-driven, non-evaluated, institutionally-bound, task-oriented, asymmetrical, etc.) make it a multifaceted and interesting form of interaction for discourse analysis. | |
− | + | This study includes both an ethnographic account of academic interactions between teachers and students within the culturally-situated context of a German university as well as a more detailed analysis of the interactional organization of this speech event. Drawing on naturally-occurring data from two German universities, the overall structural organization of these interactions is investigated using a micro, CA-type analysis of participants’ actions. The analytical focus is put on the sequential activities teachers and students engage in during the different phases of the consultation. This includes, e.g., how participants open office hour talk, how they establish an agenda, how they manage advice-giving, and, finally, how they close the consultation. Implications are drawn regarding the interactional effectiveness as well as the socio-academic importance of this talk. Furthermore, suggestions are made as to how these findings might be implemented in an academic setting. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
|- | |- | ||
|valign="top" align="center" bgcolor="#F2F4F9"| | |valign="top" align="center" bgcolor="#F2F4F9"| | ||
Line 73: | Line 71: | ||
==Tue Jan. 20, 2009: Megan Macdonald, "Liturgical Lens: Performance Art and Christianity"== | ==Tue Jan. 20, 2009: Megan Macdonald, "Liturgical Lens: Performance Art and Christianity"== | ||
+ | :[http://www.drama.qmul.ac.uk/staff/profiles/Macdonald.html Megan Macdonald at the Department of Drama, Queen Mary, University of London] | ||
− | + | :What influence do western spiritual practices have on how we understand religion and spirituality? Through examples from contemporary performance practices and a comparison between academic analyses of Marina Abramović's The House With the Ocean View this talk will open up questions surrounding how we use language to discuss and write about the spiritual. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
=Summer 2009= | =Summer 2009= |
Revision as of 09:27, 10 January 2009
- (In der Regel) Dienstags 18:15, Raum A6 2-212
- Veranstalter: Seminar für Anglistik und Amerikanistik der Universität Oldenburg
- Organisation: Dr. Olaf Simons
|
Forschungskolloquium des Seminars Tue Jan. 13, 2009 Gleich et al. (1982: 44) have described academic office hours “as an institutionalized form of ‘taking time’ for the student”. While both sides involved in this interaction generally agree on the importance of these encounters, the participants seldom reflect on the possibilities and difficulties that these interactions entail (especially for students). Ethnographic studies have pointed out the necessity for an improvement of teacher – student contact outside of class (e.g. Gleich et al. 1982; Boettcher and Meer 2000). In the research field of academic discourse analysis, very little is known about how teachers and students mutually construct these consultations and how they design their verbal actions to achieve a (successful) outcome. The features of this academic talk (i.e. face-to-face, interactive, student-driven, non-evaluated, institutionally-bound, task-oriented, asymmetrical, etc.) make it a multifaceted and interesting form of interaction for discourse analysis. This study includes both an ethnographic account of academic interactions between teachers and students within the culturally-situated context of a German university as well as a more detailed analysis of the interactional organization of this speech event. Drawing on naturally-occurring data from two German universities, the overall structural organization of these interactions is investigated using a micro, CA-type analysis of participants’ actions. The analytical focus is put on the sequential activities teachers and students engage in during the different phases of the consultation. This includes, e.g., how participants open office hour talk, how they establish an agenda, how they manage advice-giving, and, finally, how they close the consultation. Implications are drawn regarding the interactional effectiveness as well as the socio-academic importance of this talk. Furthermore, suggestions are made as to how these findings might be implemented in an academic setting. |
|
Contents
- 1 Winter 2008/09
- 1.1 Tue. Nov. 4, 2008: Kalí Tal, "Trauma Theory and the Candidacy of John McCain"
- 1.2 Tue. Dec. 2, 2008: Isabel Karremann: "The Art of Forgetting in Literary and Cultural Studies"
- 1.3 Tue. Dec. 9, 2008: Angela Baier: "I feel, I feel the Deity within" - Georg Friedrich Händels Oratorien und der whiggistische Enthusiasmus
- 1.4 Tue Dec. 16, 2008: Christina Meyer, "Trauma Frames"
- 1.5 Tue Jan. 13, 2009: Holger Limberg, "Teacher-Student Interaction at University: The Discourse of Academic Office Hours"
- 1.6 Tue Jan. 20, 2009: Megan Macdonald, "Liturgical Lens: Performance Art and Christianity"
- 2 Summer 2009
Die Veranstaltung findet meist Dienstags (im Seminarratsraum A6-2-212) statt. In der Regel steht ein Vortrag von 45 Minuten bis einer Stunde im Zentrum einer offenen Diskussion. Interessierte alle Fächer sind zu jeder dieser Veranstaltungen herzlich eingeladen. Ansprechpartner für Ideen und Organisation (wie etwa die Aufnahme in die Mailinglist) ist
Winter 2008/09Tue. Nov. 4, 2008: Kalí Tal, "Trauma Theory and the Candidacy of John McCain"
Tue. Dec. 2, 2008: Isabel Karremann: "The Art of Forgetting in Literary and Cultural Studies"
Tue. Dec. 9, 2008: Angela Baier: "I feel, I feel the Deity within" - Georg Friedrich Händels Oratorien und der whiggistische Enthusiasmus
Tue Dec. 16, 2008: Christina Meyer, "Trauma Frames"
Tue Jan. 13, 2009: Holger Limberg, "Teacher-Student Interaction at University: The Discourse of Academic Office Hours"
Tue Jan. 20, 2009: Megan Macdonald, "Liturgical Lens: Performance Art and Christianity"
Summer 2009Date under consideration: Maike Engelhardt: "Qualitative Forschung"Details folgen. Archive and Planning
|