2020-21 MM Polarizing Fiction: Science in Popular Literature

From Angl-Am
Revision as of 10:00, 29 October 2020 by Anna Auguscik (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search
     work-in-progress
  • Course: 3.02.980
  • Time: Thursday 10-12h
  • Venue: online via Stud.IP, BBB meetings
  • Course Description: In this course, we will focus on two novels that fit a wide range of categories: both Kim Stanley Robinson's Antarctica (1997) and Michael Crichton's State of Fear (2004) have been read and discussed under the umbrella of various genre buzzwords. As popular fiction (respectively, science fiction and techno-thriller), these novels are set apart in their production, circulation and reception from what is commonly known as literary fiction. As polar fiction, they belong to a tradition of texts set in the extreme landscape of the North or South Pole. As science novels, they take scientists, their methods and practice centre-stage. As climate fiction, Robinson's and Crichton's novels participate in a highly politicized debate. In fact, the authors have often been placed on or become the spokesperson of opposite sides of the public discourse on global warming. It is at this crossroads that their oeuvre becomes of interest to a literary and cultural investigation of these texts from the perspective of questions regarding the canon and its margins.

Please, buy and read the following novels:

  • Robinson, Kim Stanley. Antarctica (1997).
  • Crichton, Michael. State of Fear (2004).
  • as well as one other science thriller / science fiction text by either of these two authors: [to be discussed individually]


PLEASE NOTE: All primary materials will be made available at the CvO bookshop. Please use the time until the beginning of term to immerse yourself in the reading of the first two novels. Additional materials for preparation, as well as the detailed syllabus, will be made available here and/or on Stud.IP. There will be a Handapparat in our library.


Session 1: 22 Oct 2020

  • Welcome: Please read my message under 'Ankündigungen on Stud.IP'; familiarize yourself with the draft syllabus that you find here and note the course requirements for 9 KP (talk to me individually about the 12 KP or 15 KP options and the respective 'project'):
  • (1) written responses and textual analysis assignments (upload weekly to Stud.IP)
  • (2) three RPOs (1 per novel, 1 page each; upload to Stud.IP)
  • (3) one seminar paper (15-20 pp), based on the topic of one of your RPOs (upload to Stud.IP and hand in as print version by 15 March).
  • We will meet on Stud.IP (go to our course --> 'meetings' --> no camera, mute microphone (we will add these as we proceed)

Session 2: 29 Oct 2020

  • Context I: Science and Scientists in Fiction
  • Reading and discussion:
  • Please, read Haynes in Public Understanding of Science (2014); ZAA 2016 (Schaffeld; as well as Kirchhofer & Roxburgh); Engelhardt and Hoydis, "Introduction" (2019)
  • We will discuss some major topics in 'literature and science studies' based on your reading.
  • Further reading: Martin Willis on Literature and Science; Haynes, From Madman to Crime Fighter: The Scientist in Western Culture and From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature; as well as Holland (2019) and others (see Seminarapparat)
  • Tasks: mind-map and responses (see Stud.IP)

Session 3: 05 Nov 2020

  • Context II: Popular Fiction, or a Horizontal Approach to Literary and Genre Fiction
  • Reading and discussion:
  • To begin with, please, read Rachel Donadio's essay on "Revisiting the Canon Wars" (2007)
  • To provide some background to the various perspectives in the result of this debate, you may read the introduction to Harold Bloom's The Western Canon, see Stud.IP, and JD Porter's pamphlet of the Stanford Lab
  • For our discussion of what constitutes 'Popular Fiction', please read Murphy and Matterson's "Introduction: 'Changing the Story' - Popular Fiction Today" (2018); Ken Gelder's "Popular Fiction: The Opposite of Literary Fiction?" (2004); Pawling's "Introduction: Popular Fiction: Ideology or Utopia" (1984), see Stud.IP.
  • Possible further reading: Ken Gelder's "The Fields of Popular Fiction" (2016); Scott McCracken's "The Half-Lives of Literary Fictions: Genre Fictions in the Late Twentieth Century" (2006); extracts from John Sutherland's Bestsellers (1991) and Tony Bennett's Popular Fiction (1990)
  • Task: mind-map and responses (see Stud.IP)

Session 4: 12 Nov 2020

  • Context III: Polar Fiction, or Antarctica in Fiction
  • Reading: Elizabeth Leane, extracts from [tba]

Session 5:

  • Antarctica
  [Hand in RPO #1 until session 6]

Session 6:

  • Antarctica


Session 7:

  • Discussion of Antarctica RPOs


Session 8:

  • State of Fear
  [Hand in RPO #2 until session 9]

Session 9:

  • State of Fear


Session 10:

  • Discussion of State of Fear RPOs


Session 11:

  • third novel
  [Hand in RPO #3 until session 12]

Session 12:

  • Discussion of third novel RPOs


Session 13:

Session 14:

  • discussion of research papers
  • feedback on evaluation
  [Hand in research papers until 15 March 2021]

Tools

Primary Reading

  • see above

Secondary Reading

  • will be made available via Stud.IP; the "Handapparat"; and/or via the university's online access:

Further Reading

  • cf. Stud.IP/Dateien
  • Antarctica:
  • 'The Moment Is Here … and It's Important': State, Agency, and Dystopia in Kim Stanley Robinson's Antarctica and Ursula K. LeGuin's The Telling By: Moylan, Tom. pp. 135-153 IN: Baccolini, Raffaella(ed. and introd.); Moylan, Tom(ed. and introd.) Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination. New York, NY: Routledge; 2003. xi, 264 (book article)
  • Scripts Deep Enough: Kim Stanley Robinson's Antarctica By: Voermans, Paul. The New York Review of Science Fiction ; 1999 Jan; 11(5 [125]) 1, 4-5. Dragon (journal article)
  • Antarctica as a Scientific Utopia By: Leane, Elizabeth. Foundation: The International Review of Science Fiction ; 2003 Autumn; 32(89) 27-35. Science Fiction Foundation (journal article)
  • Spoiler Alert: Scott, Science, and Forms of Reenactment in Contemporary Expedition Narratives By: Auguscik, Anna. Anglistik ; 2019 Summer; 30(2) 47-64. Universitätsverlag Winter GmbH (journal article)
  • Dead Penguins in Immigrant Pikchard Scandal: Telling Stories about 'The Environment' in Antartica By: Vint, Sherryl; Bould, Mark. pp. 257-273 IN: Burling, William J.(ed. and preface) Kim Stanley Robinson Maps the Unimaginable: Critical Essays. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company Publishing; 2009. viii, 303 (book article)
  • Le Relativisme épistémologique dans la science-fiction contemporaine By: Chabot, Hugues. pp. 87-100 IN: Berthelot, Francis(ed. and introd.); Clermont, Philippe(ed. and introd.) Science-fiction et imaginaires contemporains. Paris, France: Éditions Honoré Champion; 2007. 465 (book article)
  • State of Fear
  • Fear of Reason: Michael Crichton's State of Fear By: Benford, Gregory; Hoffert, Martin. The New York Review of Science Fiction ; 2005 Apr; 17(8 [200]) 15-16. Dragon (journal article)
  • Nationalism, Masculinity, and the Politics of Climate Change in the Novels of Kim Stanley Robinson and Michael Crichton By: Hamming, Jeanne. Extrapolation: A Journal of Science Fiction and Fantasy ; 2013 Spring; 54(1) 21-45. Liverpool University Press (journal article)
  • Apparent Truth and False Reality: Michael Crichton and the Distancing of Scientific Discourse By: Genty, Stéphanie. ASp: La Revue du GERAS ; 2009; 55 95-106. Groupe d'Etudes et de Recherche en Anglais de Spécialité (GERAS) (journal article)
  • The Adaptation of Disaster: Representations of Environmental Crises in Climate Change Fiction By: Nitzke, Solvejg. Komparatistik Online ; 2018; 38-58. UnknownPublisher (journal article)
  • The Unbearable Lightness of Green: Air Travel, Climate Change and Literature By: Garrard, Greg. Green Letters: Studies in Ecocriticism ; 2013; 17(2) 175-188. Routledge (journal article)

Quotes

Links