2007-08 BM1: Session 3

From Angl-Am
Revision as of 16:58, 3 September 2007 by Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Back to 2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1


  • Though we can assume that all periods and languages produced works we may read as literature - the bodies of works we put together as the different national literatures are a comparatively new invention.
  • What we understand as "literary materials" did not form the same context before the 1750s.
  • The discussion of "literature" grew from the 15th into the 18th century as a discussion of scientific works
  • Those who discussed the sciences popularised their debate by turning it into a debate of poetical and fictional works between 1750 and 1850.
  • Alternative fields of materials - "poetry" and the "belles lettres" and modes of their evaluation were declared inappropriate and delegitimised by our modern discussion of literary works.
  • If you do written work on the university level
  • Do not assume that contexts and traditions you find explained in histories of literature were also known to those who wrote and read these "literary" works before the 1750s.
  • Do assume that entirely different contexts existed wherever we see something as literature of the past - contexts such as that of
  • the "belles lettres" - the market of fashionable books read all over Europe (a context existing between 1600-1800),
  • "poetry" - the field of works in verse including prose comedy and (between 1600 and 1800) the opera,
  • "histories" - both true and fictional, serious and scandalous including "romances" and "novels" before the 1750s.