Difference between revisions of "2007-08 BM1: Session 6"

From Angl-Am
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>
 
<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>
<hr>
 
  
*'''The rise of the novel''' was originally - from the 16th into the 18th century - understood as the rise of realistic shorter stories (today called "novellas") defeating the rivaling romances
+
*[[The Novel in the Nineteenth Century - The Order of Fictions|Presentation]]
:*'''Novels''' - such as Cervantes' ''Novelas exemplares'' (1613) - were supposed to
+
 
::*teach through '''good and bad examples''' of what men and women did in peculiar ("novel", i.e. new) situations
+
 
::*entertain with their rapidly evolving plots of '''intrigues''' (i.e. secret plans)
+
==Received Notions about nineteenth-century fiction:==
::*avoid all lofty romantic language
+
 
::*end with a point - a surprising turn of the events which the story teller could be expected to use for a more or less serious moral conclusion
+
*The novel as the privileged art form of bourgeois self-reflection (The triumph of Realism)
:*'''Romances''' - such as the ''Amadis'' which had driven Cervantes' ''Don Quixote'' into a comical heroism - were supposed to
+
*The novel as the privileged medium of popular entertainment (popular fiction, circulating libraries)
::*be '''long epic works''' of high and '''beautiful language'''
+
*The differentiation into subgenres
::*be constructed as in successions of '''adventures''',
+
 
::*celebrate the deeds of '''great heroes''',
+
==Questions and second thoughts==
::*inspire an '''emulation''' of the hero's spirit.
+
*are realist novels "realistic"?
*The "rise of the novel" as defined in 1957 by Ian Watt in his book of the same title
+
*how do the first two characteristics go together: the popular and commercial character of fiction and the art quality?
:*turned French fictional works of the 17th century into original "romances",
+
*what drives the production of subgenres: aesthetic progress, new fashions?
:*claimed the new romances written by Defoe and his followers to be the first real "modern novels".
+
 
*Research of the last two decades has detected a production of "novels" written before Defoe as the original (or "proto-") novel. Authors from Aphra Behn to Eliza Haywood have become "mothers of the English novel" in that development.
+
==A concerted view of the development of fiction in the 19th century. &mdash; "The order of fictions"==
 +
 
 +
In the course of the eighteenth century, the problematic overlappings between fiction and the real world have been severely cut down.
 +
 
 +
At least from around 1780 onwards, there is an "order of fictions" which circumscribes the place of fiction in public discourse and regulates the conditions of its development and circulation.
 +
 
 +
#all fictions now have obvious signs, by which they are recognized as fiction (narrative techniques, "unrealistically" comprehensive knowledge of narrators [omniscience], Intertextual references to the literary tradition, connections to topics of public debate, ...)
 +
#all fictions are produced for and circulate on a market which is structured by internal criteria: -- a scale: popular vs. high art -- types: subgenres with typical features...
 +
#beyond this market, there is the undiscussable production of "penny dreadfuls" ...
 +
 
 +
Example: ''Middlemarch'' (construction of the narrative voice; non-imitative; marketing choices; sensational aspects, condition of England, the positivist philosophy...)
 +
 
 +
==What to do with 19th century novels==
 +
 
 +
*Look for signals of fictionality...
 +
 
 +
Question/Reflection: In this new order of fictions, what is the relation between fiction and scandal?

Latest revision as of 09:52, 4 December 2007

Back to 2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1


Received Notions about nineteenth-century fiction:

  • The novel as the privileged art form of bourgeois self-reflection (The triumph of Realism)
  • The novel as the privileged medium of popular entertainment (popular fiction, circulating libraries)
  • The differentiation into subgenres

Questions and second thoughts

  • are realist novels "realistic"?
  • how do the first two characteristics go together: the popular and commercial character of fiction and the art quality?
  • what drives the production of subgenres: aesthetic progress, new fashions?

A concerted view of the development of fiction in the 19th century. — "The order of fictions"

In the course of the eighteenth century, the problematic overlappings between fiction and the real world have been severely cut down.

At least from around 1780 onwards, there is an "order of fictions" which circumscribes the place of fiction in public discourse and regulates the conditions of its development and circulation.

  1. all fictions now have obvious signs, by which they are recognized as fiction (narrative techniques, "unrealistically" comprehensive knowledge of narrators [omniscience], Intertextual references to the literary tradition, connections to topics of public debate, ...)
  2. all fictions are produced for and circulate on a market which is structured by internal criteria: -- a scale: popular vs. high art -- types: subgenres with typical features...
  3. beyond this market, there is the undiscussable production of "penny dreadfuls" ...

Example: Middlemarch (construction of the narrative voice; non-imitative; marketing choices; sensational aspects, condition of England, the positivist philosophy...)

What to do with 19th century novels

  • Look for signals of fictionality...

Question/Reflection: In this new order of fictions, what is the relation between fiction and scandal?