Difference between revisions of "Figurative Speech"
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) (→Analysing Metaphors) |
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) (→Analysing Metaphors) |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
|lovers, | |lovers, | ||
|that | |that | ||
− | |bgcolor=#eoeoeo|[feel] | + | |bgcolor="#eoeoeo"|[feel] |
|gladnesse | |gladnesse | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
|align=center|" | |align=center|" | ||
|bathen in | |bathen in | ||
− | |bgcolor=#eoeoeo|[water, etc] | + | |bgcolor="#eoeoeo"|[water, etc] |
|} | |} | ||
*'''Step 3''': State the ground of the metaphor | *'''Step 3''': State the ground of the metaphor |
Revision as of 13:36, 27 April 2007
Contents
Tropes (Tropen)
any expression which implies a transference of meaning
Simile
explicit/overt comparison, ‘as’, ‘like’.
Example: I wandered lonely as a cloud (Wordsworth).
Metaphor
implicit/covert comparison without the usage of 'as' or 'like'.
Example: But ye lovers, that bathen in gladnesse (Chaucer, T&C)
Metonymy
replaces one expression by another, which has a spatial, temporal, or logical connection with it.
Example: I'll have a glass or two.
Synecdoche
a part stands for the whole, or vice versa.
Example: The Vatican has commented on recent events.
Allegory
a set of analogies.
Example: 'Justice' as a woman with sword, balance and eye patch.
Symbol
an object which is assigned an underlying meaning.
Example: It was the nightingale, and not the lark (Shakespeare, R&J).
Analysing Metaphors
- Step 1: Separate literal from figurative use
L: | But | ye | lovers, | that | ———— | gladnesse |
F: | " | " | " | " | bathen in | ———— |
- Step 2: Construct tenor and vehicle, by postulating semantic elements to fill in the gaps of the literal and figurative interpretations
TEN: | But | ye | lovers, | that | [feel] | gladnesse |
VEH: | " | " | " | " | bathen in | [water, etc] |
- Step 3: State the ground of the metaphor
Gladness is the lovers' element which they enjoy as a simple natural pleasure
Analysing Interplay
- Step 1: Identify the metre (maximization principle)
- Step 2: Identify realized accentuation
- Step 3: Identify the points of deviation when comparing the outcome of step 1 and step 2
- Step 4: Describe the points of deviation in historic context