Difference between revisions of "Histories of English Literature"
From Angl-Am
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The seminar could read 19th- and 20th century histories of literature and ask for predecessors of the genre. | The seminar could read 19th- and 20th century histories of literature and ask for predecessors of the genre. | ||
| − | *how did the | + | *how did the plotlines develop? |
*what authorial positions can be observed | *what authorial positions can be observed | ||
*out of what genres (e.g. traditional histories of literature, histories of poetry, histories of fiction) did our modern histories of literature evolve? | *out of what genres (e.g. traditional histories of literature, histories of poetry, histories of fiction) did our modern histories of literature evolve? | ||
[[Category:Seminar Idea|Literature]] | [[Category:Seminar Idea|Literature]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:31, 24 April 2007
Histories of (English) Literature deal with the evolution of literature. We do not normally see them as texts we could again read as representatives of a literary genre.
The seminar could read 19th- and 20th century histories of literature and ask for predecessors of the genre.
- how did the plotlines develop?
- what authorial positions can be observed
- out of what genres (e.g. traditional histories of literature, histories of poetry, histories of fiction) did our modern histories of literature evolve?
