Talk:2008-09 BM1 Assignment 2: Drama

From Angl-Am
Revision as of 18:21, 7 January 2009 by Anna Auguscik (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

I just read the new assignment and wonder what the "blaue Modulzettel" is? Thanks for your answer!

Sorry, the official name is "Anmeldung / Bescheinigung für eine Modulprüfung" (download here). Best, Anna Auguscik 23:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Page design

Hello,

am I mistaken, or do we really have to use: right margin:3cm AND left margin:4cm for the Assignment? It does not look right to me. Any help is welcome. Thanks

Student Samples

Sample 1

1. Close Analysis of the Passage

a) The passage can be divided into four different parts, regarding the communicative situation and its changes and variations.
The first part goes from line 406 to 408 and is an informative soliloquy, spontaneously improvised by Ferdinand about Ariel’s song which he just heard and finds supernatural, reminding him of his father who he considers to be dead.
In the second part from line 409 to 419 the communicative situation changes and Prospero draws Miranda’s attention to Ferdinand, whom she finds beautiful, by giving a direct command “[…] and say what thou seest yond” (ll. 9-10 ½). This makes Prospero seem dominant and leading the conversation, underlined by the number of lines the two characters speak in general in the passage, as Prospero has 13, whereas Miranda just has seven. This is furthermore stressed by Prospero interrupting and correcting Miranda, who thinks that Ferdinand is supernatural.
The third part now is a shorter one, going from line 420 to 422 ½, showing Prospero’s contention about how things worked out. In the first part there is an “aside” and Prospero does not address any particular person, but the communicative situation changes, as Prospero remembers that what happened is due to Ariel, and addresses him in the second part of this section, thanking him. That the other two characters cannot hear him again underlines Prospero’s dominance of the conversation, he influences it as he wants.
Now, for the first time, all three characters talk with each other in the last part, which goes from line 422 ½ to 432. One could think that Ferdinand dominates the conversation here, because he speaks the most in lines, although this is not the case as he just wants to express his feelings for Miranda which are plenty, but rather Prospero dominates the conversation again, because he interrupts and instructs, but this time Ferdinand and not Miranda.
b) Ferdinand is characterized figuratively as beautiful and seemingly supernatural by Miranda in lines 410-412, what is an explicit characterization in the dialogue between Miranda and Prospero in absentia, because Ferdinand does not seem to hear this, although he is on stage. Because Miranda says this it gets more convenient on the one hand because she is a woman and men normally do not judge another man’s beauty but on the other hand also weakens the characterization because the audience knows that she has not seen any men except Caliban and Prospero in her life.
Furthermore Ferdinand is also characterized as good looking by Prospero in lines 415-416 “thou mightst call him a goodly person” in the same mode as Miranda did, but now evokes a different effect as he is a male also and so again, on the one hand strengthens what Miranda said before, but on the other hand makes it more unconvincing. This contrast confuses the audience. Ferdinand characterizes himself implicitly as polite and honorable by stylistic texture as he speaks with Miranda, trying to please her and thus uses a lot of according words with a positive connotation as for example “goddess” or “good instructions”. This draws a positive light on him.
Miranda is mostly characterized figuratively and implicitly by Prospero who gives direct commands and corrects her, making her seem narrow minded and inexperienced. This is a characterization by verbal behavior which is very convincing for the audience. In the same way she characterized Ferdinand as good looking and supernatural, he characterizes her now. The only difference in mode is that she is present while he says it, so he directly addresses her, what underlines his braveness.
Prospero is mainly characterized implicitly by his own verbal behavior, as he dominates and leads the conversation in our passage, making him seem calculating and following a certain plan. It also characterizes him as omniscient, as he seems to know the answer to everything. This creates tension about how far his plans will work out or not and what exactly he is actually planning. :Prospero is also characterized implicitly and authorial by his name. It indicates that his plans will prosper, what they will do later on in the play, and could also refer to his lost prosperity he now wants to get back due to his plans.
c) The stylistic level throughout our passage never goes entirely below the “Genius Medium” as it is written in blank verse and thus already reaches beyond colloquial speech which is a characteristic of the “Genius Humile”. Nevertheless one can still see differences in the language of the different characters, as for example Miranda only has small parts of speech and thus also just uses short sentences with a simple syntax, being is a feature of the “Genus Medium”, although it also shows some characteristics of the “Genus Humile” as for example almost no figures of speech. Prospero’s language here is more metaphorical, consisting of longer and more complex sentences, although not reaching into the “Genus Grande” as he wants to stay on a practical level and push forward his plan. Ferdinand’s style is similar to Prospero’s with the exception that he also shows some aspects of the “Genus Grande”, as for example an extraordinary sentence structure or the usage of solemn terms like “goddess” (l. 422 ), when he addresses Miranda to express his feelings for her.

2. Looking at the Wider Context

a) The way characters influence each other is important in our passage, where Prospero leads the conversation in the way he wants it to be, as well as throughout the whole Drama. In the passage Act 2, Sc. 2, ll. 122-174 there is a similar situation, as Stephano influences Caliban and Trinculo to his behalf, just transferred to a lower intellectual and stylistic level. Instead of using his language and intellect to influence his collocutors, like Prospero does, Stephano uses alcohol. Also Prospero’s determination is more solidified, whereas Stephano does not really know why he is doing this, he just enjoys the power he has and does not follow a certain plan. This simplification can also be seen in the formal comparison of the two passages as Stephano, Trinculo and Caliban almost only use the “Genus Humile” with short sentences and a lot of colloquial expressions, just broken on and off by some metaphors or comparisons that however are inappropriate or wrong, as for example “kiss the book” (l. 27), whereas Prospero only uses the “Genus Medium” as mentioned in 1c.
b) In our passage some kind of dramatic irony is created by the fact that Miranda and Ferdinand do not know certain things that the audience does, as for example Ferdinand still thinks that his father is dead or Miranda assumes that Ferdinand is a spirit. This is the case more often in the drama, mostly because of Prospero’s seeming omniscience which is transmitted to the audience, which then knows certain things the characters do not and thus the behavior of those is regarded in a more expectant way. On the one hand this creates another layer of suspense, as for example if characters will take the fatal or the saving option, us already knowing which one is right. On the other hand this can also create humorous situations, as for example Trinculo and Stephano not being sure if Caliban is a fish or a man. These situations are created to keep the audience entertained and paying attention.