Difference between revisions of "Talk:2008 BM1 Assignment 1: Poetry"

From Angl-Am
Jump to: navigation, search
(Assignment 1, Question 3)
(Assignment 1, Question 3)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
:"Comment on" is a bit more than just "name" yet less then "write a full blown interpretation". --[[User:Olaf Simons|Olaf Simons]] 15:09, 24 April 2008 (CEST)
 
:"Comment on" is a bit more than just "name" yet less then "write a full blown interpretation". --[[User:Olaf Simons|Olaf Simons]] 15:09, 24 April 2008 (CEST)
  
Another Question[[Link title]]
+
Another Question
 +
== Headline text ==
 +
 
  
 
But how much more, do we have to do?
 
But how much more, do we have to do?

Revision as of 15:54, 25 April 2008

Test

I won't be able to come in next time. Cheers. Corinna Brinkmann 12:36, 9 April 2008 (CEST)

Assignment 1, Question 3

Are we supposed to interpret the metre and rhyme scheme with regard to the content or shall we only name these? Alena Ruether

"Comment on" is a bit more than just "name" yet less then "write a full blown interpretation". --Olaf Simons 15:09, 24 April 2008 (CEST)

Another Question

Headline text

But how much more, do we have to do?

I am right now working with the poem and I have some problems with the word 'comment' and 'identify'! Does 'identify' mean we are just supposed to declare which sections or addressee we have found out? And does 'comment' mean we shall find out the metre and rhyme scheme and afterwards say what is special about it? Or shall we also say what influence differences in metre or something else have on the poem?

I am a little scared to hand in my assignment, because it seems to me that I don't know how to begin!