2007-08 BM1: Session 3 - Revision history

Olaf Simons at 11:41, 12 November 2007

2007-11-12T11:41:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:41, 12 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>		<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>
	*[http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/anglistik/lit-wiss/pre/2007-11-06.html presentation]		*[http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/anglistik/lit-wiss/pre/2007-11-06.html presentation]



	~~==Received Notions on==~~

	~~==Second Thoughts==~~


	~~==More complex or differentiated perspectives==~~



	~~==What do we do with...==~~

Olaf Simons at 12:58, 6 November 2007

2007-11-06T12:58:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:58, 6 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>		<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>
			*[http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/anglistik/lit-wiss/pre/2007-11-06.html presentation]

Neel9276: /* Received Notions on */

2007-10-28T10:57:33Z

Received Notions on

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 28 October 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	==Received Notions on==		==Received Notions on==


	==Second Thoughts==		==Second Thoughts==

Olaf Simons at 14:44, 21 October 2007

2007-10-21T14:44:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 21 October 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:*'''"poetry"''' - the field of '''works in verse''' including prose comedy and (between 1600 and 1800) the opera,		:*'''"poetry"''' - the field of '''works in verse''' including prose comedy and (between 1600 and 1800) the opera,
	:*'''"histories"''' - both '''true and fictional''', serious and scandalous including "romances" and "novels" before the 1750s.		:*'''"histories"''' - both '''true and fictional''', serious and scandalous including "romances" and "novels" before the 1750s.

			==Literature==

			*Olaf Simons, A short history of the literary debate (2001), [http://www.uni-oldenburg.de/anglistik/lit-wiss/simons/marteaus-europa/085-set.html Anglistik Oldenburg]

Anton Kirchhofer at 12:16, 19 October 2007

2007-10-19T12:16:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 19 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>		<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>




			==Received Notions on==


			==Second Thoughts==


			==More complex or differentiated perspectives==



			==What do we do with...==






	==Argument 2: Other contexts existed where we find "literature" written before 1750==		==Argument 2: Other contexts existed where we find "literature" written before 1750==

Olaf Simons at 17:39, 3 September 2007

2007-09-03T17:39:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:39, 3 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>		<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>

	==Argument 2: Other contexts existed ~~wherever~~ we find "literature" written before 1750==		==Argument 2: Other contexts existed where we find "literature" written before 1750==

	*Though we can assume that all periods and languages produced works we may read as literature - the bodies of works we put together as '''the different national literatures are basically a 19th century invention.		*Though we can assume that all periods and languages produced works we may read as literature - the bodies of works we put together as '''the different national literatures are basically a 19th century invention.

Olaf Simons at 16:21, 3 September 2007

2007-09-03T16:21:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:21, 3 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>		<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>
	~~<hr>~~

	==Argument 2: Other contexts existed wherever we find "literature" written before 1750==		==Argument 2: Other contexts existed wherever we find "literature" written before 1750==

Olaf Simons at 16:16, 3 September 2007

2007-09-03T16:16:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:16, 3 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>		<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>
	<hr>		<hr>

			==Argument 2: Other contexts existed wherever we find "literature" written before 1750==

	*Though we can assume that all periods and languages produced works we may read as literature - the bodies of works we put together as '''the different national literatures are basically a 19th century invention.		*Though we can assume that all periods and languages produced works we may read as literature - the bodies of works we put together as '''the different national literatures are basically a 19th century invention.

Olaf Simons at 16:07, 3 September 2007

2007-09-03T16:07:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:07, 3 September 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	<hr>		<hr>

	*Though we can assume that all periods and languages produced works we may read as literature - the bodies of works we put together as the different national literatures are basically a 19th century invention.		*Though we can assume that all periods and languages produced works we may read as literature - the bodies of works we put together as '''the different national literatures are basically a 19th century invention.
	*The discussion of "literature" emerged as a discussion of scientific works		*The discussion of '''"literature"''' emerged as a discussion of '''scientific works'''.
	*Those who discussed the sciences popularised their debate ~~in the~~ between 1750 and 1850 by turning it into a debate of poetical and fictional works.		*Those who discussed the sciences '''popularised''' their debate between 1750 and 1850 by turning it into a debate of '''poetical and fictional works'''.
	*Alternative fields of materials - most important those of "poetry" and the "belles lettres" and their traditional modes of appreciation were delegitimised and declared inappropriate by our present discussion of literary works during the last 250 years.		*Alternative fields of materials - most important those of "poetry" and the "belles lettres" and their traditional modes of appreciation were delegitimised and declared inappropriate by our present discussion of literary works during the last 250 years.
	*If you do written work on the university level - do assume that entirely different contexts existed wherever you feel something is "literature" of the ~~past~~ - contexts such as that of		*If you do written work on the university level do assume that entirely different contexts existed wherever you feel something is "literature" in our modern sense of the word - contexts such as that of
	:*the "belles lettres" - the market of fashionable books read all over Europe (a context existing between 1600-1800),		:*the '''"belles lettres"''' - the market of '''fashionable books''' read all over Europe (a context existing between 1600-1800),
	:*"poetry" - the field of works in verse including prose comedy and (between 1600 and 1800) the opera,		:*'''"poetry"''' - the field of '''works in verse''' including prose comedy and (between 1600 and 1800) the opera,
	:*"histories" - both true and fictional, serious and scandalous including "romances" and "novels" before the 1750s.		:*'''"histories"''' - both '''true and fictional''', serious and scandalous including "romances" and "novels" before the 1750s.

Olaf Simons at 15:04, 3 September 2007

2007-09-03T15:04:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 3 September 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*Those who discussed the sciences popularised their debate in the between 1750 and 1850 by turning it into a debate of poetical and fictional works.		*Those who discussed the sciences popularised their debate in the between 1750 and 1850 by turning it into a debate of poetical and fictional works.
	*Alternative fields of materials - most important those of "poetry" and the "belles lettres" and their traditional modes of appreciation were delegitimised and declared inappropriate by our present discussion of literary works during the last 250 years.		*Alternative fields of materials - most important those of "poetry" and the "belles lettres" and their traditional modes of appreciation were delegitimised and declared inappropriate by our present discussion of literary works during the last 250 years.
	*If you do written work on the university level		*If you do written work on the university level - do assume that entirely different contexts existed wherever you feel something is "literature" of the past - contexts such as that of
	~~:*Do~~ assume that entirely different contexts existed wherever you feel something is "literature" of the past - contexts such as that of		:*the "belles lettres" - the market of fashionable books read all over Europe (a context existing between 1600-1800),
	::*the "belles lettres" - the market of fashionable books read all over Europe (a context existing between 1600-1800),		:*"poetry" - the field of works in verse including prose comedy and (between 1600 and 1800) the opera,
	::*"poetry" - the field of works in verse including prose comedy and (between 1600 and 1800) the opera,		:*"histories" - both true and fictional, serious and scandalous including "romances" and "novels" before the 1750s.
	::*"histories" - both true and fictional, serious and scandalous including "romances" and "novels" before the 1750s.