https://wiki.angl-am.uni-oldenburg.de/wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3A2007-08_BM1%3A_Session_4 2026-04-24T22:21:49Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.43.8 https://wiki.angl-am.uni-oldenburg.de/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2007-08_BM1:_Session_4&diff=7817&oldid=prev 2007-11-13T16:25:02Z

<p></p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>Some thoughts on session 4 --[[User:Anna Auguscik|Anna Auguscik]]<br /> <br /> *Possible positioning in literary debate<br /> :Finding a &#039;real&#039; question/problem for a research paper etc. does not imply the attempt to appease a debate but rather to offer an incentive for an already existing discussion or even open a new one. Would you agree? <br /> <br /> *Why do we not produce a stable definition of literature?<br /> :A possible answer and one which presents itself after the lecture is that the lack of a stable definition enables an ongoing, never-ending debate. Is that it? Is that why we talk about literature? In order to talk about it? Speaking of circular definitions...<br /> <br /> *Pierre Whatshisname<br /> :Who was this seventeenth century very important journalist you mentioned?</div>

Anna Auguscik