Histories of English Literature: Difference between revisions
From Angl-Am
Jump to navigationJump to search
Olaf Simons (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The seminar could read 19th- and 20th century histories of literature and ask for predecessors of the genre. | The seminar could read 19th- and 20th century histories of literature and ask for predecessors of the genre. | ||
*how did the | *how did the plotlines develop? | ||
*what authorial positions can be observed | *what authorial positions can be observed | ||
*out of what genres (e.g. traditional histories of literature, histories of poetry, histories of fiction) did our modern histories of literature evolve? | *out of what genres (e.g. traditional histories of literature, histories of poetry, histories of fiction) did our modern histories of literature evolve? | ||
[[Category:Seminar Idea|Literature]] | |||
Latest revision as of 19:31, 24 April 2007
Histories of (English) Literature deal with the evolution of literature. We do not normally see them as texts we could again read as representatives of a literary genre.
The seminar could read 19th- and 20th century histories of literature and ask for predecessors of the genre.
- how did the plotlines develop?
- what authorial positions can be observed
- out of what genres (e.g. traditional histories of literature, histories of poetry, histories of fiction) did our modern histories of literature evolve?
