2007-08 BM1: Session 2: Difference between revisions

From Angl-Am
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


*Our present histories of literature show different periodisations
*Our present histories of literature show different periodisations
*Two positions towards periods can claim equal justification:
*Two positions towards periods should at least be reflected:
:*Periods are given with each period producing its own special literature. The literary works of a period help us to understand the frame of mind of the respective historical era.
:*Periods exist with each period producing its own special works. The literature of a period helps us to understand the frame of mind of the respective era.
:*We produce ever changing periodisations to prove historical developments we want to claim as our own cultural heritage. We support our notions of these developments on the basis of a canon of literary works we select so that they will illustrate the different periods.
:*We produce ever changing periodisations to prove historical developments we want to claim as parts of our cultural heritage. We base our notions of these developments on a canon of literary works which we select and interpret so that they will fit into the respective period.
*The past has played different roles in different centuries.
*History and the past have played entirely different roles over the centuries.
*The future is a relatively new invention of our debate of history.
*The future is a relatively new invention of our historical debate.
*If you do written work on the university level
:*Do not open your seminar papers with explanations of the spirit of the period - which you feel your reader might need to understand the work you want to write about.
:*You can discuss common notions we have about these periods (as to be found in ''Wikipedia'', the ''Encyclopedia Britannica'' or in specific scientific works) critically - that is if you feel they distorted our view on materials of this period.

Revision as of 15:15, 3 September 2007

Back to 2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1


  • Our present histories of literature show different periodisations
  • Two positions towards periods should at least be reflected:
  • Periods exist with each period producing its own special works. The literature of a period helps us to understand the frame of mind of the respective era.
  • We produce ever changing periodisations to prove historical developments we want to claim as parts of our cultural heritage. We base our notions of these developments on a canon of literary works which we select and interpret so that they will fit into the respective period.
  • History and the past have played entirely different roles over the centuries.
  • The future is a relatively new invention of our historical debate.
  • If you do written work on the university level
  • Do not open your seminar papers with explanations of the spirit of the period - which you feel your reader might need to understand the work you want to write about.
  • You can discuss common notions we have about these periods (as to be found in Wikipedia, the Encyclopedia Britannica or in specific scientific works) critically - that is if you feel they distorted our view on materials of this period.