2007-08 BM1: Session 2: Difference between revisions
From Angl-Am
Jump to navigationJump to search
Olaf Simons (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Olaf Simons (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*Our present histories of literature show different periodisations | *Our present histories of literature show different periodisations | ||
*Two positions towards periods | *Two positions towards periods should at least be reflected: | ||
:*Periods | :*Periods exist with each period producing its own special works. The literature of a period helps us to understand the frame of mind of the respective era. | ||
:*We produce ever changing periodisations to prove historical developments we want to claim as our | :*We produce ever changing periodisations to prove historical developments we want to claim as parts of our cultural heritage. We base our notions of these developments on a canon of literary works which we select and interpret so that they will fit into the respective period. | ||
* | *History and the past have played entirely different roles over the centuries. | ||
*The future is a relatively new invention of our debate of | *The future is a relatively new invention of our historical debate. | ||
*If you do written work on the university level | |||
:*Do not open your seminar papers with explanations of the spirit of the period - which you feel your reader might need to understand the work you want to write about. | |||
:*You can discuss common notions we have about these periods (as to be found in ''Wikipedia'', the ''Encyclopedia Britannica'' or in specific scientific works) critically - that is if you feel they distorted our view on materials of this period. | |||
Revision as of 15:15, 3 September 2007
Back to 2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1
- Our present histories of literature show different periodisations
- Two positions towards periods should at least be reflected:
- Periods exist with each period producing its own special works. The literature of a period helps us to understand the frame of mind of the respective era.
- We produce ever changing periodisations to prove historical developments we want to claim as parts of our cultural heritage. We base our notions of these developments on a canon of literary works which we select and interpret so that they will fit into the respective period.
- History and the past have played entirely different roles over the centuries.
- The future is a relatively new invention of our historical debate.
- If you do written work on the university level
- Do not open your seminar papers with explanations of the spirit of the period - which you feel your reader might need to understand the work you want to write about.
- You can discuss common notions we have about these periods (as to be found in Wikipedia, the Encyclopedia Britannica or in specific scientific works) critically - that is if you feel they distorted our view on materials of this period.