2007-08 BM1: Session 6: Difference between revisions

From Angl-Am
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>
<small>Back to [[2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1]]</small>
<hr>
<hr>
*'''The rise of the novel''' was originally - from the 16th into the 18th century - understood as the rise of realistic shorter stories (today called "novellas") defeating the rivaling romances
:*'''Novels''' - such as Cervantes' ''Novelas exemplares'' (1613) - were supposed to
::*teach through '''good and bad examples''' of what men and women did in peculiar ("novel", i.e. new) situations
::*entertain with their rapidly evolving plots of '''intrigues''' (i.e. secret plans)
::*avoid all lofty romantic language
::*end with a point - a surprising turn of the events which the story teller could be expected to use for a more or less serious moral conclusion
:*'''Romances''' - such as the ''Amadis'' which had driven Cervantes' ''Don Quixote'' into a comical heroism - were supposed to
::*be '''long epic works''' of high and '''beautiful language'''
::*be constructed as in successions of '''adventures''',
::*celebrate the deeds of '''great heroes''',
::*inspire an '''emulation''' of the hero's spirit. 
*The "rise of the novel" as defined in 1957 by Ian Watt in his book of the same title
:*turned French fictional works of the 17th century into original "romances",
:*claimed the new romances written by Defoe and his followers to be the first real "modern novels".
*Research of the last two decades has detected a production of "novels" written before Defoe as the original (or "proto-") novel. Authors from Aphra Behn to Eliza Haywood have become "mothers of the English novel" in that development.

Revision as of 16:54, 3 September 2007

Back to 2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1


  • The rise of the novel was originally - from the 16th into the 18th century - understood as the rise of realistic shorter stories (today called "novellas") defeating the rivaling romances
  • Novels - such as Cervantes' Novelas exemplares (1613) - were supposed to
  • teach through good and bad examples of what men and women did in peculiar ("novel", i.e. new) situations
  • entertain with their rapidly evolving plots of intrigues (i.e. secret plans)
  • avoid all lofty romantic language
  • end with a point - a surprising turn of the events which the story teller could be expected to use for a more or less serious moral conclusion
  • Romances - such as the Amadis which had driven Cervantes' Don Quixote into a comical heroism - were supposed to
  • be long epic works of high and beautiful language
  • be constructed as in successions of adventures,
  • celebrate the deeds of great heroes,
  • inspire an emulation of the hero's spirit.
  • The "rise of the novel" as defined in 1957 by Ian Watt in his book of the same title
  • turned French fictional works of the 17th century into original "romances",
  • claimed the new romances written by Defoe and his followers to be the first real "modern novels".
  • Research of the last two decades has detected a production of "novels" written before Defoe as the original (or "proto-") novel. Authors from Aphra Behn to Eliza Haywood have become "mothers of the English novel" in that development.