2007-08 BM1: Session 2: Difference between revisions

From Angl-Am
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<hr>
<hr>


*Our present histories of literature show different periodisations, two positions towards periods should be reflected:
*Our present histories of literature show '''different and competing periodisations''', two conflicting positions towards periods should be reflected:
:*Periods exist with each period producing its own special works. The literature of a period helps us to understand its frame of mind.
:*Periods exist with each era producing its characteristic literature. The great works of a period help us - consequently - to better understand the frame of mind of each age.
:*We produce ever changing periodisations to "prove" historical developments we want to claim as our cultural heritage. We base our notions of these developments on a canon of literary works which we select and interpret in order to produce the periods we want to have.
:*We produce ever changing periodisations to "prove" historical developments we want to claim as our cultural heritage. We base our notions of these developments on a canon of literary works which we select and interpret in order to produce the periods we want to have.
*History and the past have played entirely different roles over the centuries. The discussion of historical and future developments are relatively new fields of the cultural debate.
*History and the past have played entirely different roles over the centuries. The discussion of historical and future developments are relatively new fields of the cultural debate.

Revision as of 17:02, 3 September 2007

Back to 2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1


  • Our present histories of literature show different and competing periodisations, two conflicting positions towards periods should be reflected:
  • Periods exist with each era producing its characteristic literature. The great works of a period help us - consequently - to better understand the frame of mind of each age.
  • We produce ever changing periodisations to "prove" historical developments we want to claim as our cultural heritage. We base our notions of these developments on a canon of literary works which we select and interpret in order to produce the periods we want to have.
  • History and the past have played entirely different roles over the centuries. The discussion of historical and future developments are relatively new fields of the cultural debate.
  • If you do written work on the university level
  • Do not enrich your seminar papers with explanations of the period - which you feel your reader might need to understand the work in question (your reader can be expected to inform himself on such trivia).
  • You may critically discuss common or less common notions about periods (as to be found in Wikipedia, the Encyclopedia Britannica or in specific scientific works) - if you feel these notions distorted our view on materials you want to examine closer.