Difference between revisions of "2007-08 BM1: Session 4"
From Angl-Am
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) |
Olaf Simons (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:*a division between works which deserve to be discussed as literature and a broad market of low materials anyone with an understanding of true literary merits should openly detest. | :*a division between works which deserve to be discussed as literature and a broad market of low materials anyone with an understanding of true literary merits should openly detest. | ||
*The nations adopted the debate of literature in attempts to generate fields of a secular text based education. | *The nations adopted the debate of literature in attempts to generate fields of a secular text based education. | ||
− | *The public embraced the new literatures as | + | *The public embraced the new literatures as fields which would call for extremely pluralistic debates. |
Revision as of 17:17, 3 September 2007
Back to 2007-08 BM1 Introduction to the Critical and Scholarly Discussion of Literature, Part 1
- The creation of what is now literature in the different languages is basically a 19th century development, it began in Germany in the 1750s and it reached the Anglo-Saxon world only in the middle of the 19th century.
- Literature - as a field of the nation's poetical and fictional works - invited
- an appraisal of the nation's art and character - to be developed out of the appreciation of poetry
- interpretations of hidden meanings and cultural significance - to be developed out of the theological interpretation of biblical texts)
- a critical scholarly debate of progress and use - to be developed out of the preceding debate scientific publications as literary materials
- a division between works which deserve to be discussed as literature and a broad market of low materials anyone with an understanding of true literary merits should openly detest.
- The nations adopted the debate of literature in attempts to generate fields of a secular text based education.
- The public embraced the new literatures as fields which would call for extremely pluralistic debates.