Difference between revisions of "2007-08 AM Le Morte Darthur (1485)"

From Angl-Am
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Texts==
 
==Texts==
  
I originally intended to base the seminar on Caxton's edition as offered by EEBO - hoping the Penguin edition would offer a decent transcription of that source. The Penguin edition is, however, modernised throughout. The best alternative is at the moment the Winchester Manuscript as published in the critical Norton edition. The problem is here the wild layout (an attempt to reproduce graphical aspects of the original handwritten text) and the fact that the manuscript remained unknown till its rediscovery in 1934.
+
I originally intended to base the seminar on Caxton's fist edition published in 1485 as offered by EEBO:
  
My recommendation is to use either edition - Penguin or Norton Critical or an html-Text of the Penguin edition I will provide. We should spend some work on a comparison of the Penguin modernised text with Caxton's original and might actually edit a part of the Caxton text on the internet.
+
* [http://eebo.chadwyck.com/search/full_rec?SOURCE=pgimages.cfg&ACTION=ByID&ID=22102180&FILE=../session/1183624385_29976&SEARCHSCREEN=CITATIONS&SEARCHCONFIG=config.cfg&DISPLAY=ALPHA Sir Thomas Malory, ''Le Morte Darthur'' (London: William Caxton, 1485)]
 +
 
 +
A modernised-spelling version of that text is offered as a Penguin classic:
 +
 
 +
*** Sir Thomas Malory, ''Le Morte d'Arthur''. Ed. Cowen, Janet (1970). Introduction by Lawlor, John. 2 vols. London: Penguin. ISBN 0-679-60099-X, ISBN 0-14-043044-X.
 +
 
 +
The original spelling Caxton text is offered on the internet in the University of Michigan's "Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse":
 +
 
 +
* [http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=cme;idno=MaloryWks2 Presentation with links into the individual chapters]
 +
* [http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=cme;cc=cme;rgn=main;view=text;idno=MaloryWks2 Full Text Download]
 +
 
 +
The best alternative is the Winchester Manuscript as published in the critical Norton edition. The problem is here the wild layout (an attempt to reproduce graphical aspects of the original handwritten text) and the fact that the manuscript remained unknown till its rediscovery in 1934 - I prefer to work with a text readers could actually read.
 +
 
 +
My recommendation is the Penguin-edition for easy reading or, better though regrettably neither anotated nor available as a book) the University of Michigan's html-Web-edition.

Revision as of 11:16, 5 July 2007

Texts

I originally intended to base the seminar on Caxton's fist edition published in 1485 as offered by EEBO:

A modernised-spelling version of that text is offered as a Penguin classic:

The original spelling Caxton text is offered on the internet in the University of Michigan's "Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse":

The best alternative is the Winchester Manuscript as published in the critical Norton edition. The problem is here the wild layout (an attempt to reproduce graphical aspects of the original handwritten text) and the fact that the manuscript remained unknown till its rediscovery in 1934 - I prefer to work with a text readers could actually read.

My recommendation is the Penguin-edition for easy reading or, better though regrettably neither anotated nor available as a book) the University of Michigan's html-Web-edition.